Clinical Dysmorphology

1.5k papers and 10.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology in the last decades have received a total of 10.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology usually cover Genetics (868 papers), Molecular Biology (580 papers) and Surgery (316 papers) specifically the topics of Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (240 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (161 papers) and Connective tissue disorders research (158 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Dysmorphology are Ahmad I. Alomari, M Baraitser, Helga V. Toriello, Alan Fryer, William Reardon, J. M. Cobben, Dian Donnai, Robin M. Winter, L.I. Al-Gazali and Jill Clayton‐Smith.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Dysmorphology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Dysmorphology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Dysmorphology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Dysmorphology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025