Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Local Turn in Peace Building: a critical agenda for peace
2013520 citationsRoger Mac Ginty, Oliver P. Richmondprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Oliver P. Richmond
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Oliver P. Richmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oliver P. Richmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oliver P. Richmond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Oliver P. Richmond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oliver P. Richmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oliver P. Richmond. The network helps show where Oliver P. Richmond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Oliver P. Richmond
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Oliver P. Richmond.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Oliver P. Richmond based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Oliver P. Richmond. Oliver P. Richmond is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Newman, Edward, Roland Paris, & Oliver P. Richmond. (2009). New Perspectives on Liberal Peacebuilding. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).175 indexed citations
Richmond, Oliver P.. (2001). A perilous catalyst? EU accession and the Cyprus problem. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).6 indexed citations
13.
Newman, Edward & Oliver P. Richmond. (2001). The United Nations and human security. Palgrave eBooks.11 indexed citations
Александров, С. Е. & Oliver P. Richmond. (1998). The general analytical solution in the theory of ideal unsteady plastic flows under conditions of plane deformation. Doklady Physics. 43(2). 105–107.1 indexed citations
16.
Александров, С. Е. & Oliver P. Richmond. (1998). Asymptotic behavior of the velocity field in the case of axially symmetric flow of a material obeying the Treska condition. Doklady Physics. 43(6). 362–364.2 indexed citations
17.
Richmond, Oliver P.. (1996). Negotiating out of fear and fearing to negotiate: Theoretical approaches to the ending of the Cyprus conflict. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 8(2). 99–110.2 indexed citations
18.
Richmond, Oliver P.. (1994). Peacekeeping and Peacemaking in Cyprus 1974-1994. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 6(2). 7–42.3 indexed citations
Speich, G. R., et al.. (1981). Effect of Volume Fraction and Shape of Sulfide Inclusions on Through-Thickness Ductility and Impact Energy of High-Strenght 4340 Plate Steels. Section I. Part I. Axisymmetric and Plane-strain Tensile Ductility. Part II. Impact Energy and Transition Temperature.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.