International Nursing Review

1.6k papers and 30.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in International Nursing Review in the last decades have received a total of 30.0k indexed citations. Papers published in International Nursing Review usually cover General Health Professions (807 papers), Emergency Medical Services (388 papers) and Clinical Psychology (315 papers) specifically the topics of Global Health Workforce Issues (241 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (169 papers) and Nursing education and management (158 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Nursing Review are Howard Catton, Sue ‎Turale, Wipada Kunaviktikul, Dilek Yıldırım, Leodoro J. Labrague, Susan L. Johnson, Chiu‐Yueh Hsiao, Chia‐Yi Chiao, Hsuan‐Ta Wu and Allison Squires.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Nursing Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Nursing Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Nursing Review.

Countries where authors publish in International Nursing Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Nursing Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Nursing Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Nursing Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025