International Journal of Wellbeing

282 papers and 7.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 282 papers published in International Journal of Wellbeing in the last decades have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations. Papers published in International Journal of Wellbeing usually cover Social Psychology (170 papers), Clinical Psychology (83 papers) and General Health Professions (56 papers) specifically the topics of Role of Positive Emotions in Well-Being (133 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (30 papers) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Wellbeing are Margaret L. Kern, Jan Huyton, Lalage Sanders, J. Corey Butler, Tim Lomas, Aaron Jarden, Rachel Dodge, Ruut Veenhoven, Tess Knight and Eranda Jayawickreme.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Wellbeing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Wellbeing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Wellbeing.

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Wellbeing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Wellbeing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Wellbeing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Wellbeing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025