BMC Clinical Pathology

279 papers and 6.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 279 papers published in BMC Clinical Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 6.6k indexed citations. Papers published in BMC Clinical Pathology usually cover Molecular Biology (82 papers), Oncology (80 papers) and Surgery (65 papers) specifically the topics of Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (16 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMC Clinical Pathology are Viroj Wiwanitkit, Elahé T Crockett, Ali Khosrowbeygi, Nosratollah Zarghami, Diana Doeing, Matthew D. Krasowski, Allan Bardow, Anne Marie Lynge Pedersen, Birgitte Nauntofte and Darryl Shibata.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMC Clinical Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMC Clinical Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMC Clinical Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in BMC Clinical Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMC Clinical Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMC Clinical Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMC Clinical Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025