Countries where authors publish in International Agrophysics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Agrophysics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Agrophysics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Agrophysics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in International Agrophysics
This network shows the impact of papers published in International Agrophysics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Agrophysics.
About International Agrophysics
The 1.5k papers published in International Agrophysics in the last decades have received a total of 18.8k indexed citations . Papers published in International Agrophysics usually cover Physiology (173 papers), Soil Science (272 papers) and Civil and Structural Engineering (296 papers) specifically the topics of Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization (192 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (183 papers), Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects (173 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (156 papers), Food composition and properties (138 papers), Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics (94 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (93 papers) and Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Agrophysics are A. Tabatabaeefar, S. Pietruszewski, Jerzy Lipiec, Artur Nosalewicz, J. Podleśny, Zofia Stępniewska, Claude Doussan, B. Witkowska-Walczak, A.M. Gajda and Ewa A. Czyż.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.