Lisa Federer

1.0k total citations
26 papers, 562 citations indexed

About

Lisa Federer is a scholar working on Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Lisa Federer has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 562 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Information Systems, 13 papers in Information Systems and Management and 11 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Lisa Federer's work include Research Data Management Practices (14 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (12 papers) and Data Quality and Management (11 papers). Lisa Federer is often cited by papers focused on Research Data Management Practices (14 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (12 papers) and Data Quality and Management (11 papers). Lisa Federer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Lisa Federer's co-authors include Douglas Joubert, Ya‐Ling Lu, Chris Belter, Alicia A. Livinski, Holly Thompson, Brennan Spiegel, Folasade P. May, Judith A. Welsh, Martijn G.H. van Oijen and Deborah S. Loeff and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gastroenterology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Lisa Federer

26 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lisa Federer United States 11 304 214 182 68 65 26 562
Kevin Read Canada 11 187 0.6× 136 0.6× 117 0.6× 12 0.2× 40 0.6× 37 321
Wolfgang Kuchinke Germany 13 47 0.2× 89 0.4× 61 0.3× 16 0.2× 153 2.4× 35 540
Ya‐Ling Lu United States 5 149 0.5× 110 0.5× 85 0.5× 5 0.1× 62 1.0× 12 306
Elizabeth D. Dalton United States 8 361 1.2× 328 1.5× 178 1.0× 3 0.0× 53 0.8× 19 583
Mahsa Shabani Belgium 19 182 0.6× 82 0.4× 62 0.3× 12 0.2× 482 7.4× 51 928
Jerry Sheehan United States 6 60 0.2× 62 0.3× 48 0.3× 17 0.3× 70 1.1× 8 415
Frank Ückert Germany 15 88 0.3× 43 0.2× 65 0.4× 20 0.3× 153 2.4× 69 649
Ayoung Yoon United States 14 424 1.4× 284 1.3× 304 1.7× 6 0.1× 24 0.4× 41 582
Betsy Rolland United States 11 42 0.1× 93 0.4× 23 0.1× 97 1.4× 90 1.4× 36 361
Iain Hrynaszkiewicz United States 13 334 1.1× 299 1.4× 128 0.7× 8 0.1× 153 2.4× 31 651

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Federer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Federer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Federer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Federer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Federer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Federer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Federer. The network helps show where Lisa Federer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Federer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Federer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Federer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Federer. Lisa Federer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zhang, Yin, Dan Wu, Loni Hagen, et al.. (2022). Data science curriculum in the iField. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(6). 641–662. 7 indexed citations
2.
Federer, Lisa. (2022). Long-term availability of data associated with articles in PLOS ONE. PLoS ONE. 17(8). e0272845–e0272845. 9 indexed citations
3.
Giustini, Dean, Kevin Read, Ariel Deardorff, Lisa Federer, & Melissa L. Rethlefsen. (2021). Health sciences librarians’ engagement in open science: a scoping review. Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA. 109(4). 540–560. 8 indexed citations
4.
Stall, Shelley, Maryann E. Martone, Ishwar Chandramouliswaran, et al.. (2020). Generalist Repository Comparison Chart. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 9 indexed citations
5.
Read, Kevin, Ariel Deardorff, Lisa Federer, Dean Giustini, & Melissa L. Rethlefsen. (2020). Health sciences librarians' support of researchers and engagement in open science: a scoping review (protocol). OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
6.
Federer, Lisa, et al.. (2020). The Medical Library Association Data Services Competency: a framework for data science and open science skills development. Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA. 108(2). 304–309. 14 indexed citations
7.
Federer, Lisa & Jian Qin. (2019). Beyond the data management plan: Expanding roles for librarians in data science and open science. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 56(1). 529–531. 6 indexed citations
8.
Rorissa, Abebe, Lisa Federer, Loni Hagen, Jeonghyun Kim, & James E. Andrews. (2019). Data science research and practice: High time for synergy. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 56(1). 575–577. 1 indexed citations
9.
Federer, Lisa, Chris Belter, Douglas Joubert, et al.. (2018). Data sharing in PLOS ONE: An analysis of Data Availability Statements. PLoS ONE. 13(5). e0194768–e0194768. 117 indexed citations
10.
Federer, Lisa & Douglas Joubert. (2018). Providing Library Support for Interactive Scientific and Biomedical Visualizations with Tableau. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(1). e1120–e1120. 6 indexed citations
11.
Federer, Lisa. (2018). Defining data librarianship: a survey of competencies, skills, and training. Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA. 106(3). 294–303. 58 indexed citations
12.
Federer, Lisa. (2016). Research data management in the age of big data: Roles and opportunities for librarians. Information Services & Use. 36(1-2). 35–43. 43 indexed citations
13.
Federer, Lisa, Ya‐Ling Lu, & Douglas Joubert. (2016). Data literacy training needs of biomedical researchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA. 104(1). 52–57. 35 indexed citations
14.
Federer, Lisa, et al.. (2015). Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff. PLoS ONE. 10(6). e0129506–e0129506. 73 indexed citations
15.
Federer, Lisa. (2014). Exploring New Roles for Librarians. 2 indexed citations
16.
May, Folasade P., et al.. (2014). Explaining persistent under-use of colonoscopic cancer screening in African Americans: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine. 71. 40–48. 76 indexed citations
17.
Federer, Lisa. (2014). Exploring New Roles for Librarians: The Research Informationist. 1(2). 1–47. 10 indexed citations
18.
Federer, Lisa. (2013). Embedded with the Scientists: The UCLA Experience. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(1). 6–7. 1 indexed citations
19.
Federer, Lisa. (2013). The librarian as research informationist: a case study. Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA. 101(4). 298–302. 32 indexed citations
20.
Meller, Janet L., Hernan M. Reyes, Deborah S. Loeff, Lisa Federer, & Jennifer R. Hall. (1991). One-drug versus two-drug antibiotic therapy in pediatric perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized study.. PubMed. 110(4). 764–7; discussion 767. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026