This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Immunotherapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Immunotherapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Immunotherapy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Immunotherapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Immunotherapy.
About Immunotherapy
The 2.0k papers published in Immunotherapy in the last decades have received a total of 33.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Immunotherapy usually cover Immunology (857 papers), Oncology (940 papers), Immunology and Allergy (140 papers), Hematology (134 papers) and Dermatology (101 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (565 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (421 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (326 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (299 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (130 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (130 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (112 papers) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Immunotherapy are Sylvia Adams, Toshio Tanaka, Tadamitsu Kishimoto, Melissa Bersanelli, Masashi Narazaki, Omar Mohammed Abdel-Rahman, Amy J. Petty, Yiping Yang, Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard and Richard L. Wasserman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.