International Journal of Biomedical Imaging

11.7k citations
498 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal of Biomedical Imaging

480 papers receiving 11.2k citations

Peers

International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
Comparison fields: 5 of 197
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 5.3k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2.9k
  • Neurology 1.2k
  • Biomedical Engineering 3.7k
  • Ophthalmology 656
Replace IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering with:
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering United States
IRBM France
Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering United States
IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine United States
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Imaging & Visualization India
Biomedical Engineering Letters South Korea
Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors Iran
IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging China
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Australia
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery United States
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging relative to IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering United States IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Biomedical Imaging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Biomedical Imaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Biomedical Imaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Biomedical Imaging more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Biomedical Imaging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Biomedical Imaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Biomedical Imaging.

About International Journal of Biomedical Imaging

The 498 papers published in International Journal of Biomedical Imaging in the last decades have received a total of 11.7k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Biomedical Imaging usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (276 papers), Computational Mathematics (5 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (157 papers), Biophysics (29 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (171 papers) specifically the topics of Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (116 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (99 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (83 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (51 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (50 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (45 papers), AI in cancer detection (40 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Biomedical Imaging are Ge Wang, Zujun Hou, H. Pal Thethi, Arun Kumar Ray, Nilesh Bhaskarrao Bahadure, Hengyong Yu, Valery V. Tuchin, Maarit Venermo, Tommi Pätilä and Petri Välisuo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact