Indian Journal of Pharmacology

2.7k papers and 43.1k indexed citations

About

The 2.7k papers published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology in the last decades have received a total of 43.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology usually cover Molecular Biology (412 papers), Pharmacology (400 papers) and Pharmacology (334 papers) specifically the topics of Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (134 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (120 papers) and Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (105 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Indian Journal of Pharmacology are Ya‐Fen Lin, Mark G. M. Aarts, Vidhi Gautam, Rajiv Gupta, Reena Singh, Anurag Mishra, Chetna Desai, A. Subramoniam, NirmalaN Rege and A Kulkarni.

In The Last Decade

Indian Journal of Pharmacology

2.5k papers receiving 36.6k citations

Countries where authors publish in Indian Journal of Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Indian Journal of Pharmacology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026