Countries where authors publish in Indian Journal of Pharmacology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Indian Journal of Pharmacology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology.
About Indian Journal of Pharmacology
The 2.7k papers published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology in the last decades have received a total of 43.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Indian Journal of Pharmacology usually cover Pharmacology (334 papers), Toxicology (125 papers) and Complementary and alternative medicine (265 papers) specifically the topics of Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (134 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (120 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (105 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (100 papers), Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions (99 papers), Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (84 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (83 papers) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Indian Journal of Pharmacology are Ya‐Fen Lin, Mark G. M. Aarts, Vidhi Gautam, Anurag Mishra, Reena Singh, Rajiv Gupta, Chetna Desai, A. Subramoniam, NirmalaN Rege and A Kulkarni.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.