International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity
183 papers
receiving
858 citations
Peers
International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
Sociology and Political Science366
Education262
Political Science and International Relations167
Anthropology127
Gender Studies66
Replace OBETS Revista de Ciencias Sociales with:
OBETS Revista de Ciencias SocialesSpain
AIBR Revista de Antropologia IberoamericanaMexico
Urban anthropology and studies of cultural systems and world economic developmentUnited States
Anthropology Southern AfricaSouth Africa
NómadasColombia
South African Review of SociologySouth Africa
Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic StudiesUnited States
Critical African StudiesUnited Kingdom
SpiritusBrazil
Journal of Iberian and Latin American ResearchAustralia
International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarityrelative toOBETS Revista de Ciencias SocialesSpainOBETS Revista de Ciencias Sociales's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
OBETS Revista de Ciencias Sociales · 1×
×0.9366/422SPS
×1.8262/149EDUCA
×1.2167/137PSIR
×2.5127/51ANTHR
×0.866/78GS
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity more than expected).
Fields of papers published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity
This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity.
About International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity
The 245 papers published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity usually cover Development (26 papers), Anthropology (46 papers) and Business and International Management (6 papers) specifically the topics of African cultural and philosophical studies (52 papers), African history and culture studies (31 papers) and African studies and sociopolitical issues (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi- Inter- and Transdisciplinarity are Godwell Nhamo, Verene A. Shepherd, D. Wadada Nabudere, Stella M. Nkomo, Adams Bodomo, Cheryl Hendricks, Paul Tiyambe Železa, Gregory Kamwendo, Alfred Maroyi and Catherine A. Odora Hoppers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.