IET Nanobiotechnology

997 papers and 16.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 997 papers published in IET Nanobiotechnology in the last decades have received a total of 16.5k indexed citations. Papers published in IET Nanobiotechnology usually cover Materials Chemistry (492 papers), Biomedical Engineering (368 papers) and Biomaterials (202 papers) specifically the topics of Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (393 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (120 papers) and Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (118 papers). The most active scholars publishing in IET Nanobiotechnology are Mahendra Rai, Mehrdad Khatami, Muhammad Zia, Jie Wu, Sania Naz, P. Senthil Kumar, Samad Mussa Farkhani, Alireza Valizadeh, Sanchaita Lala and Aniket Gade.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in IET Nanobiotechnology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in IET Nanobiotechnology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in IET Nanobiotechnology.

Countries where authors publish in IET Nanobiotechnology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in IET Nanobiotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in IET Nanobiotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IET Nanobiotechnology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025