Electronic Commerce Research

1000 papers and 16.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1000 papers published in Electronic Commerce Research in the last decades have received a total of 16.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Electronic Commerce Research usually cover Sociology and Political Science (397 papers), Marketing (362 papers) and Information Systems and Management (190 papers) specifically the topics of Digital Marketing and Social Media (313 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (188 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (161 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Electronic Commerce Research are Jin Baek Kim, Vili Lehdonvirta, Ismail Sila, Xue Ding, Zhong Yang, Marios Sotiriadis, Ciná Van Zyl, Shuling Liao, Tseng‐Lung Huang and Wanglin Ma.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Electronic Commerce Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Electronic Commerce Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Electronic Commerce Research.

Countries where authors publish in Electronic Commerce Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Electronic Commerce Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Electronic Commerce Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electronic Commerce Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025