Jane Marie Kirschling
- Research and Theory top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 8
- Health Sciences Research and Education 5
- Health and Wellbeing Research 3
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 11
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 16
-
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving 4
- Family Support in Illness 4
-
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 3
- Co-authors
- Barbara J. StewartPatricia G. ArchboldTheresa A. HarvathLois L. MillerAnne NeufeldMargaret J. BullEileen BreslinMerwyn R. Greenlick
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane Marie Kirschling
43 papers receiving 580 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Research and Theory 39
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 26
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 87
- General Health Professions 293
- Clinical Psychology 230
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Marie Kirschling
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Marie Kirschling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Marie Kirschling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Marie Kirschling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Marie Kirschling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Marie Kirschling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Marie Kirschling. The network helps show where Jane Marie Kirschling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Marie Kirschling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 33 | |
| 6 | Predictors of registered nurses' willingness to remain in nursing. | 2011 | 3 |
| 7 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 30 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 19 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 111 | |
| 15 | Establishing partnerships with family caregivers. Local and cosmopolitan knowledge. | 1995 | 4 |
| 16 | 1993 | 15 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1986 | 3 |
About Jane Marie Kirschling
Jane Marie Kirschling is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 45 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (16 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (11 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Family Support in Illness (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers) and Health and Wellbeing Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (39 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (26 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (87 citations). Jane Marie Kirschling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Barbara J. Stewart, Patricia G. Archbold, Theresa A. Harvath, Lois L. Miller, Anne Neufeld, Margaret J. Bull, Eileen Breslin, Merwyn R. Greenlick, Sally Gadow and Barbara Valanis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.