Jane Marie Kirschling

43 papers receiving 580 citations

Peers

Jane Marie Kirschling
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • General Health Professions 293
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 238
  • Clinical Psychology 230
  • Sociology and Political Science 178
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 91
Replace F. Beryl Pilkington with:
F. Beryl Pilkington Canada
Ingela Berggren Sweden
Lisbet Lindholm Finland
Jane S. Grassley United States
Bethel Ann Powers United States
Agneta Cronqvist Sweden
John Bidewell Australia
Diana Keatinge Australia
Dianne M. Tapp Canada
Carola Skott Sweden
Jane Marie Kirschling relative to F. Beryl Pilkington Canada F. Beryl Pilkington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
F. Beryl Pilkington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Marie Kirschling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Marie Kirschling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Marie Kirschling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Marie Kirschling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Marie Kirschling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Marie Kirschling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Marie Kirschling. The network helps show where Jane Marie Kirschling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Marie Kirschling

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Marie Kirschling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Marie Kirschling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Marie Kirschling. Jane Marie Kirschling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 8
2 6
3 2
4 23
5 33
6
Predictors of registered nurses' willingness to remain in nursing.
3
7 13
8 2
9 1
10 2
11 16
12 30
13 19
14 111
15
Establishing partnerships with family caregivers. Local and cosmopolitan knowledge.
4
16 15
17 5
18 15
19 7
20 3

About Jane Marie Kirschling

Jane Marie Kirschling is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 45 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (16 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (11 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (39 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (26 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (87 citations). Jane Marie Kirschling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Barbara J. Stewart, Patricia G. Archbold, Theresa A. Harvath, Lois L. Miller, Anne Neufeld, Margaret J. Bull, Eileen Breslin, Merwyn R. Greenlick, Sally Gadow and Barbara Valanis. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Nursing & Health, Journal of Palliative Medicine and Cancer Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026