Holocaust and Genocide Studies

638 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 638 papers published in Holocaust and Genocide Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Holocaust and Genocide Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (360 papers), Political Science and International Relations (324 papers) and History (222 papers) specifically the topics of European history and politics (179 papers), German History and Society (116 papers) and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (112 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Holocaust and Genocide Studies are Vahakn N. Dadrian, Johannes Lang, Mark Levene, Paul Williams, Michael Freeman, Michael Mann, Roger W. Smith, Geoffrey H. Hartman, Thomas Blass and Richard L. Rubenstein.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Holocaust and Genocide Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Holocaust and Genocide Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Holocaust and Genocide Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Holocaust and Genocide Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Holocaust and Genocide Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Holocaust and Genocide Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holocaust and Genocide Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025