Countries citing papers authored by Michael Freeman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Freeman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Freeman. The network helps show where Michael Freeman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Freeman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Freeman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Freeman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Freeman. Michael Freeman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Freeman, Michael. (2019). The Right to Self-Determination: Philosophical and Legal Perspectives. New England journal of public policy. 31(2). 4.5 indexed citations
2.
Freeman, Michael, Sarah Hawkes, & Belinda Bennett. (2014). Law and Global Health. Oxford University Press eBooks.5 indexed citations
Freeman, Michael. (2011). Children's rights : progress and perspectives : essays from the International Journal of Children's Rights.2 indexed citations
5.
Freeman, Michael. (2010). Upholding the Dignity and Best Interest of Children: International Law and the Corporal Punishment of Children. Law and Contemporary Problems. 73(2). 211–251.13 indexed citations
6.
Freeman, Michael. (2007). Understanding Family Law. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 54(3). 198–203.3 indexed citations
7.
Brooks‐Gordon, Belinda & Michael Freeman. (2006). Law and psychology: current legal issues. Oxford University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
8.
O’Shea, Patricia, et al.. (2005). Public Libraries in the United States, Fiscal Year 2002. E.D. TAB. NCES 2005-356.. National Center for Education Statistics.2 indexed citations
9.
O’Shea, Patricia, et al.. (2004). Data File: State Library Agencies Survey: Fiscal Year 2003. NCES 2004-378.. National Center for Education Statistics.1 indexed citations
10.
Freeman, Michael & Andrew D. Lewis. (2000). Law and medicine. Oxford University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
11.
Freeman, Michael. (1998). Legal theory at the end of the millennium. Oxford University Press eBooks.5 indexed citations
12.
Freeman, Michael. (1998). Human Rights, Asian Values, and the Clash of Civilizations. Issues & Studies. 34(10). 48–78.3 indexed citations
13.
Freeman, Michael & Andrew D. Lewis. (1997). Law and opinion at the end of the twentieth century. Oxford University Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
14.
Freeman, Michael. (1997). Legislation and the courts.1 indexed citations
15.
Freeman, Michael. (1996). The Family Law Act 1996. Sweet & Maxwell eBooks.3 indexed citations
Freeman, Michael. (1979). Violence in the home : a socio-legal study. Gower eBooks.5 indexed citations
19.
Freeman, Michael. (1976). The Children act 1975 : text, with concise commentary. Sweet & Maxwell eBooks.1 indexed citations
20.
Freeman, Michael. (1974). Reference Groups and Revolutions. European Journal of Political Research. 2(3). 271–282.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.