Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS

1.3k papers and 31.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS in the last decades have received a total of 31.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS usually cover Infectious Diseases (810 papers), Virology (736 papers) and Epidemiology (422 papers) specifically the topics of HIV Research and Treatment (736 papers), Prevention and Treatment of HIV/AIDS Infection (632 papers) and HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (368 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS are Jorge A. Tavel, Joel M. Palefsky, Daniel R. Kuritzkes, Jonathan Karn, Ghalib Alkhatib, Peter H. Kilmarx, Jessica E. Haberer, Lyle R. McKinnon, David M. Margolis and Peter W. Hunt.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS.

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025