Evaluation & the Health Professions

1.3k papers and 26.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Evaluation & the Health Professions in the last decades have received a total of 26.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Evaluation & the Health Professions usually cover General Health Professions (540 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (324 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (217 papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (190 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (136 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evaluation & the Health Professions are Steve Sussman, Russell E. Glasgow, Timothy P. Johnson, Lawrence W. Green, Jonathan B. VanGeest, Brady T. West, David Cella, Michael T. Kane, Kathleen J. Yost and Sung Soo Kim.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Evaluation & the Health Professions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evaluation & the Health Professions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evaluation & the Health Professions.

Countries where authors publish in Evaluation & the Health Professions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evaluation & the Health Professions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evaluation & the Health Professions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluation & the Health Professions more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025