Herpetology notes

582 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 582 papers published in Herpetology notes in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Herpetology notes usually cover Global and Planetary Change (440 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (200 papers) and Ecology (192 papers) specifically the topics of Amphibian and Reptile Biology (438 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (128 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (122 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Herpetology notes are Iván Sazima, Daniel Jablonski, Alexandro Marques Tozetti, Jorge Jim, Flávio Kulaif Ubaid, Raju Vyas, Truong Quang Nguyen, Gabriel Blouin‐Demers, Mirco Solé and Harshil Patel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Herpetology notes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Herpetology notes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Herpetology notes.

Countries where authors publish in Herpetology notes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Herpetology notes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Herpetology notes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herpetology notes more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025