Biota Neotropica

535 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 535 papers published in Biota Neotropica in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Biota Neotropica usually cover Ecology (196 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (188 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (176 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and animal studies (115 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (111 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biota Neotropica are Jean Paul Metzger, Carlos Alfredo Joly, Ricardo Macedo Corrêa e Castro, Iván Sazima, Elliot Watanabe Kitajima, Carla Natacha Marcolino Polaz, Valéria Cid Maia, Ariovaldo A. Giaretta, Kátia Gomes Facure and André C. Morandini.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biota Neotropica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biota Neotropica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biota Neotropica.

Countries where authors publish in Biota Neotropica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biota Neotropica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biota Neotropica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biota Neotropica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025