Herpetological review

374 papers and 2.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 374 papers published in Herpetological review in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Herpetological review usually cover Global and Planetary Change (159 papers), Ecology (98 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (88 papers) specifically the topics of Amphibian and Reptile Biology (158 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (68 papers) and Turtle Biology and Conservation (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Herpetological review are Luı́s Felipe Toledo, Gordon H. Rodda, Earl W. Campbell, Kristen K. Cecala, Kevin Arbuckle, Erin Muths, Jodi J. L. Rowley, Gerald Kuchling, Thane K. Pratt and Fred Kraus.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Herpetological review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Herpetological review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Herpetological review.

Countries where authors publish in Herpetological review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Herpetological review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Herpetological review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herpetological review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025