Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions
Countries citing papers authored by Albert Boonstra
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Albert Boonstra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Albert Boonstra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Albert Boonstra more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Albert Boonstra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Albert Boonstra. The network helps show where Albert Boonstra may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Albert Boonstra
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Albert Boonstra.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Albert Boonstra based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Albert Boonstra. Albert Boonstra is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smailhodžić, Edin, Albert Boonstra, & David Langley. (2016). Towards new social media logic in healthcare and its interplay with clinical logic. TNO Repository. 1–11.2 indexed citations
9.
Smailhodžić, Edin, Albert Boonstra, & David Langley. (2016). Social media disruptive change in healthcare: responses of healthcare providers. TNO Repository. 1–11.3 indexed citations
10.
Offenbeek, van Marjolein, Albert Boonstra, & U. Yeliz Eseryel. (2013). The dynamic interplay among institutional logics influencing hospital IT governance. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 82.1 indexed citations
11.
Boonstra, Albert. (2011). Enterprise information systems - Aligning technology, organizations and people. International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems.1 indexed citations
12.
Offenbeek, van Marjolein & Albert Boonstra. (2010). Does telehomeconsultation lead to substitution of home visits? Analysis and implications of a telehomecare program.. PubMed. 157. 148–53.7 indexed citations
Boonstra, Albert. (2006). Stakeholder Management in IOS projects: Lessons from a case study. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology).1 indexed citations
Boonstra, Albert. (2004). An empirical taxonomy of IS decision-making processes. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology).1 indexed citations
17.
Boer, Thomas de, et al.. (2002). A framework for identifying and assessing e-business opportunities. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 381–386.1 indexed citations
18.
Boer, Thomas de, et al.. (2002). 6TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL VIII, PROCEEDINGS. International Conference on Information Systems.3 indexed citations
19.
Boonstra, Albert. (2000). De ontwikkeling van een internetstrategie. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 42. 36–45.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.