The Chemical Record

1.9k papers and 58.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in The Chemical Record in the last decades have received a total of 58.3k indexed citations. Papers published in The Chemical Record usually cover Organic Chemistry (880 papers), Materials Chemistry (494 papers) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (341 papers) specifically the topics of Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (202 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (133 papers) and Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (112 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Chemical Record are Masatake Haruta, Martin Pumera, Lingamallu Giribabu, Yoshio Nishi, Takeshi Yasumoto, Jorge Bañuelos, Yoshiaki Nakao, Junichi Yoshida, Ming‐Shi Shiao and Ushasri Chilakamarthi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Chemical Record

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Chemical Record. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Chemical Record.

Countries where authors publish in The Chemical Record

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Chemical Record. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Chemical Record with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Chemical Record more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025