Graphical Models

About

The 643 papers published in Graphical Models in the last decades have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Graphical Models usually cover Computational Mechanics (373 papers), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (344 papers) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (337 papers) specifically the topics of 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (285 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (283 papers) and Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (184 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Graphical Models are Norman I. Badler, Andreas Aristidou, Ambarish Goswami, Joan Lasenby, Falai Chen, Hans‐Peter Seidel, Steve Oudot, Jean‐Daniel Boissonnat, Ron Goldman and Michael Gleicher.

In The Last Decade

Graphical Models

592 papers receiving 9.5k citations

Countries where authors publish in Graphical Models

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Graphical Models. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Graphical Models with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graphical Models more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Graphical Models

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Graphical Models. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Graphical Models.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026