Frontiers of Biogeography

445 papers and 4.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 445 papers published in Frontiers of Biogeography in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Frontiers of Biogeography usually cover Ecological Modeling (218 papers), Ecology (176 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (174 papers) specifically the topics of Species Distribution and Climate Change (218 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (147 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers of Biogeography are Nicholas J. Matzke, Kenneth J. Feeley, Robert J. Whittaker, Michael N Dawson, Thomas J. Matthews, Jim Provan, Odhran S. O’Sullivan, Joaquín Hortal, Ana Carolina Carnaval and Jason L. Brown.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frontiers of Biogeography

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers of Biogeography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers of Biogeography.

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers of Biogeography

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers of Biogeography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers of Biogeography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers of Biogeography more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025