Kenneth J. Feeley
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.2%
- Ecological Modeling top 0.1%
- Global and Planetary Change top 0.5%
- Ecology top 0.5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Miles R. SilmanEvan M. RehmBrian MachovinaTimothy M. PerezJames T. StroudWilliam J. RippleStuart J. DaviesJohn Terborgh
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (86 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (68 papers)Plant and animal studies (50 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomColombia
In The Last Decade
Kenneth J. Feeley
139 papers receiving 6.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.3k
- Ecological Modeling 2.3k
- Global and Planetary Change 2.1k
- Ecology 1.9k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.9k
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth J. Feeley
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth J. Feeley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth J. Feeley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth J. Feeley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth J. Feeley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth J. Feeley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth J. Feeley. The network helps show where Kenneth J. Feeley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth J. Feeley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth J. Feeley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth J. Feeley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth J. Feeley. Kenneth J. Feeley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 69 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | The responses of tropical forest species to global climate change: acclimate, adapt, migrate, or go extinct? | 31 |
| 17 | 69 | |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | Offspring sex and duration of post-fledging parental care in the sexually size dimorphic Nazca Booby (Sula granti) | 6 |
| 20 | 37 |
About Kenneth J. Feeley
Kenneth J. Feeley is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 142 papers that have together received 6.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (86 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (68 papers) and Plant and animal studies (50 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (2.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.3k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (2.1k citations). Kenneth J. Feeley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Miles R. Silman, Evan M. Rehm, Miles R. Silman, Brian Machovina, Timothy M. Perez, James T. Stroud, William J. Ripple, Stuart J. Davies, John Terborgh and Yadvinder Malhi. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.