Journal of Romance Studies

352 papers and 369 indexed citations i.

About

The 352 papers published in Journal of Romance Studies in the last decades have received a total of 369 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Romance Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (79 papers), History (76 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (71 papers) specifically the topics of Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (22 papers), Memory and Modernity in Democratic Spain (21 papers) and French Historical and Cultural Studies (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Romance Studies are Jo Labanyi, Cristiana Bastos, Peter Kellett, Charles Forsdick, Craig Brandist, Leo Bersani, Shirley Jordan, Étienne Balibar, Judith Still and Johannes Fabian.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Romance Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Romance Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Romance Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Romance Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Romance Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Romance Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Romance Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025