Contemporary Physics

1.9k papers and 51.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Contemporary Physics in the last decades have received a total of 51.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Physics usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (582 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (307 papers) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (207 papers) specifically the topics of Quantum Mechanics and Applications (131 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (83 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Physics are H. Lipson, R. F. Bishop, David Turnbull, K.A.R. Mitchell, Peter J. Bussey, G.G. Roberts, N. F. Mott, Julia Kempe, R. J. Rivers and John M. Charap.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Physics.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025