Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review

2.7k citations
315 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
    • Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
    • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
    • Birth, Development, and Health
    • Maternal and fetal healthcare
    • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
    • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Papers in

Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review

299 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.1k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.0k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 331
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 70
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 225
Replace Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology with:
Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology United States
Nestlé Nutrition Institute Workshop series United States
Evolution Medicine and Public Health United States
Journal of Thyroid Research United States
Experimental Diabetes Research United States
Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology United States
Endocrine development United States
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease United States
The Review of Diabetic Studies United States
Journal of Pregnancy United States
Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review relative to Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology United States Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review.

About Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review

The 315 papers published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review usually cover Obstetrics and Gynecology (106 papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (153 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (63 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (50 papers) and Surgery (71 papers) specifically the topics of Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (68 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (51 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (49 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (37 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (27 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (26 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (26 papers) and Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review are Michael Robson, D.J.P. Barker, Christian Breymann, Helen Statham, Dino A. Giussani, Mark A. Hanson, John Spencer, John‏ Kingdom, G Justus Hofmeyr and Peter G. Hepper.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact