Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review

314 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 314 papers published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (153 papers), Obstetrics and Gynecology (106 papers) and Surgery (71 papers) specifically the topics of Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (68 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (51 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (49 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review are Michael Robson, D.J.P. Barker, Christian Breymann, Dino A. Giussani, Mark A. Hanson, John Spencer, Helen Statham, John‏ Kingdom, G Justus Hofmeyr and Peter G. Hepper.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review.

Countries where authors publish in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025