Peter G. Hepper

8.8k citations
120 papers · 5.7k indexed · h-index 42

Impact in

Papers in

Peter G. Hepper

116 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Peers

Peter G. Hepper
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
  • Small Animals 877
  • Sensory Systems 557
  • Pharmacy 420
  • Developmental Biology 182
  • Orthodontics 347
Replace Daniel E. Lieberman with:
Daniel E. Lieberman United States
William J. Doyle United States
Anne M. Burrows United States
Benoı̂st Schaal France
Dennis C. Turner Switzerland
James P. Lund Canada
Temple Grandin United States
H.F.R. Prechtl Netherlands
Mark L. Laudenslager United States
Martha K. McClintock United States
Peter G. Hepper relative to Daniel E. Lieberman United States Daniel E. Lieberman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.4×
Daniel E. Lieberman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter G. Hepper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter G. Hepper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter G. Hepper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter G. Hepper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter G. Hepper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter G. Hepper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter G. Hepper. The network helps show where Peter G. Hepper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter G. Hepper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter G. Hepper Line = papers co-authored together Peter G. Hepper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201612
2 201531
3 201368
4 201256
5 200579
6 200555
7 2002128
8
The influence of length of time spent in a rescue shelter on the behaviour of kennelled dogs
200248
9 200260
10 199916
11 199933
12 199714
13 199720
14
Human fetal "olfactory" learning
199557
15
Hearing in the fetus: prenatal detection of deafness
19938
16 19937
17
Smoking, passive smoking and smell
19921
18 1991206
19 199138
20 198618

About Peter G. Hepper

Peter G. Hepper is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Developmental Biology, Pharmacy, Small Animals and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 120 papers that have together received 5.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (30 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (17 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (16 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (15 papers), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (14 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (14 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (14 papers) and Infant Health and Development (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (877 citations), Sensory Systems (557 citations), Pharmacy (420 citations), Developmental Biology (182 citations) and Orthodontics (347 citations). Peter G. Hepper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Bangladesh and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Deborah L. Wells, Chris Johnston, Donald Burden, Orlagh Hunt, S. Shahidullah, L. Graham, Mike Stevenson, Catherine Lynch, R. G. White and James Dornan. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Behaviour, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Physiology & Behavior, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology and Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026