European Finance Review

386 papers and 26.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 386 papers published in European Finance Review in the last decades have received a total of 26.7k indexed citations. Papers published in European Finance Review usually cover Finance (325 papers), Accounting (242 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (161 papers) specifically the topics of Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (199 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (194 papers) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (107 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Finance Review are William N. Goetzmann, George Andrew Karolyi, Alok Kumar, Reint Gropp, Mark S. Seasholes, Lei Feng, Sudheer Chava, Robert A. Jarrow, Steven Ongena and Florian Heider.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in European Finance Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in European Finance Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Finance Review.

Countries where authors publish in European Finance Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Finance Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Finance Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Finance Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025