Fungal Genetics and Biology

2.6k papers and 98.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Fungal Genetics and Biology in the last decades have received a total of 98.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Fungal Genetics and Biology usually cover Molecular Biology (1.6k papers), Plant Science (1.5k papers) and Cell Biology (692 papers) specifically the topics of Fungal and yeast genetics research (980 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (556 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (470 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fungal Genetics and Biology are David M. Geiser, Nancy P. Keller, Robert H. Proctor, Jin‐Rong Xu, Axel A. Brakhage, Kerry O’Donnell, Harold Kistler, Kristian Fog Nielsen, John W. Taylor and Bruce A. McDonald.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Fungal Genetics and Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Fungal Genetics and Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fungal Genetics and Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Fungal Genetics and Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fungal Genetics and Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fungal Genetics and Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fungal Genetics and Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025