Marine Resource Economics

918 papers and 17.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 918 papers published in Marine Resource Economics in the last decades have received a total of 17.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Marine Resource Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (496 papers), Global and Planetary Change (401 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (104 papers) specifically the topics of Marine and fisheries research (362 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (221 papers) and Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (175 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Marine Resource Economics are Frank Asche, James E. Wilen, Rögnvaldur Hannesson, James L. Anderson, Ragnar Árnason, Daniel S. Holland, Lee G. Anderson, Cathy A. Roheim, Ragnar Tveterås and Atle G. Guttormsen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Marine Resource Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Marine Resource Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Marine Resource Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Marine Resource Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Marine Resource Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Marine Resource Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marine Resource Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025