Environmental Practice

504 papers and 3.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 504 papers published in Environmental Practice in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Practice usually cover Sociology and Political Science (129 papers), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (120 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (102 papers) specifically the topics of Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (63 papers), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (41 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Practice are Warwick Gullett, Monica M. White, Dorceta E. Taylor, Christopher Hamlin, Jeanne M. VanBriesen, Jessica M. Wilson, David Yoxtheimer, Kelly O. Maloney, Brian Orland and Wesley E. Marshall.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025