Environmental Justice

559 papers and 5.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 559 papers published in Environmental Justice in the last decades have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Justice usually cover Sociology and Political Science (398 papers), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (150 papers) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (94 papers) specifically the topics of Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (317 papers), Risk Perception and Management (91 papers) and Urban Green Space and Health (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Justice are David N. Pellow, Sacoby Wilson, Rachel Morello‐Frosch, Carolina Balazs, Diana Hernández, Kyle Powys Whyte, Dorceta E. Taylor, Cassandra Johnson Gaither, Richard Gragg and Viniece Jennings.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Justice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Justice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Justice.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Justice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Justice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Justice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Justice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025