Emu - Austral Ornithology

3.2k papers and 33.9k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 3.2k papers published in Emu - Austral Ornithology in the last decades have received a total of 33.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Emu - Austral Ornithology usually cover Ecology (2.3k papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (789 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (788 papers) specifically the topics of Avian ecology and behavior (1.7k papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (1.2k papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (449 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Emu - Austral Ornithology are Julian Ford, H. L. Bell, Hugh Ford, Douglas Dow, Ian Rowley, Allen Keast, Peter Dann, D. L. Serventy, David C. Paton and Harry F. Recher.

In The Last Decade

Emu - Austral Ornithology

2.5k papers receiving 26.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Emu - Austral Ornithology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Emu - Austral Ornithology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Emu - Austral Ornithology.

Countries where authors publish in Emu - Austral Ornithology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Emu - Austral Ornithology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Emu - Austral Ornithology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emu - Austral Ornithology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026