H. L. Bell
- Ecology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Hugh Ford
- Topics
- Avian ecology and behavior (37 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (29 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaIndiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
H. L. Bell
57 papers receiving 442 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Ecology 390
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 244
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 239
- Ecological Modeling 134
- Genetics 56
Countries citing papers authored by H. L. Bell
This map shows the geographic impact of H. L. Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. L. Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. L. Bell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. L. Bell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. L. Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. L. Bell. The network helps show where H. L. Bell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. L. Bell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. L. Bell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. L. Bell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. L. Bell. H. L. Bell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Rainbow-bird, Merops ornatus , in New Guinea | 0 |
| 2 | New or Confirmatory Information on Some Species of New Guinean Birds | 1 |
| 3 | Carrying of Young in Flight by Coucals Cen tropu s Spp. | 0 |
| 4 | THE RELIABILITY OF ESTIMATES OF DENSITY FROM TRANSECT COUNTS | 9 |
| 5 | DISTRIBUTION AND HABITS OF KITES, Milvus migrans, Haliastur sphenurus AND H. indus IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA | 0 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | Survival among Birds of the Understorey in Lowland Rainforest in Papua New Guinea | 4 |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | The Effects of a Power-line Clearing on Birds of Dry Sclerophyll Forest at Black Mountain Reserve, Australian Capital Territory | 5 |
| 14 | Foraging Ecology, Territoriality and Seasonality of the Common Paradise Kingfisher at Brown River, Papua New Guinea | 4 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About H. L. Bell
H. L. Bell is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Ecology and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 63 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (37 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (29 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (134 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (244 citations) and Developmental Biology (39 citations). H. L. Bell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hugh Ford. Their work appears in journals such as Ibis, Wildlife Research and Emu - Austral Ornithology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.