Countries where authors publish in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine
This network shows the impact of papers published in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine.
About Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine
The 838 papers published in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 11.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine usually cover Biophysics (517 papers), Physiology (162 papers) and Biotechnology (90 papers) specifically the topics of Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects (490 papers), Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects (161 papers) and Biofield Effects and Biophysics (154 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine are M. S. Markov, A. R. Liboff, Alfonso Balmorí, Süleyman Daşdağ, Henry Lai, Mehmet Zülküf Akdağ, Nesrin Seyhan, Kavindra Kumar Kesari, Ӧlle Johansson and Arthur A. Pilla.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.