The American Journal of Jurisprudence

482 papers and 1.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 482 papers published in The American Journal of Jurisprudence in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in The American Journal of Jurisprudence usually cover Law (232 papers), Political Science and International Relations (196 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (103 papers) specifically the topics of Legal principles and applications (84 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (82 papers) and Judicial and Constitutional Studies (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The American Journal of Jurisprudence are John Finnis, Germain Grisez, John Gardner, Joseph Raz, Joseph Boyle, Philip Selznick, Brian Leiter, John T. Noonan, Susan Haack and Stephen Macedo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The American Journal of Jurisprudence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The American Journal of Jurisprudence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The American Journal of Jurisprudence.

Countries where authors publish in The American Journal of Jurisprudence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The American Journal of Jurisprudence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The American Journal of Jurisprudence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The American Journal of Jurisprudence more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025