Evidence-Based Nursing

470 papers and 6.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 470 papers published in Evidence-Based Nursing in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Evidence-Based Nursing usually cover General Health Professions (136 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (96 papers) and Epidemiology (54 papers) specifically the topics of Health Sciences Research and Education (41 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (31 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evidence-Based Nursing are Sally Thorne, Helen Noble, Joanna Smith, Roberta Heale, Alison Twycross, Brian Haynes, Nicky Cullum, Dorothy Forbes, Donna Ciliska and David Barrett.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Evidence-Based Nursing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evidence-Based Nursing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evidence-Based Nursing.

Countries where authors publish in Evidence-Based Nursing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evidence-Based Nursing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evidence-Based Nursing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence-Based Nursing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025