Earth Sciences History

483 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 483 papers published in Earth Sciences History in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Earth Sciences History usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (219 papers), Atmospheric Science (115 papers) and Geophysics (73 papers) specifically the topics of History of Science and Natural History (208 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (109 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Earth Sciences History are Martina Kölbl‐Ebert, Gareth J. Nelson, Robert E. Davis, Sílvia Fernanda de Mendonça Figueirôa, Albert V. Carozzi, Rachel Laudan, Richard J. Howarth, Edward Rose, Ronald Rainger and D. R. Stoddart.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Earth Sciences History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Earth Sciences History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Earth Sciences History.

Countries where authors publish in Earth Sciences History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Earth Sciences History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Earth Sciences History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Earth Sciences History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025