Historical Records of Australian Science

517 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 517 papers published in Historical Records of Australian Science in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Historical Records of Australian Science usually cover Anthropology (259 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (196 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (60 papers) specifically the topics of Australian Indigenous Culture and History (253 papers), History of Science and Natural History (187 papers) and History and Developments in Astronomy (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Historical Records of Australian Science are JB Kirkpatrick, Libby Robin, Ian D. Rae, Warwick Anderson, Paul Foley, George Seddon, Nick Lomb, Frank Fenner, Gavin M. Mudd and P. Andersen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Historical Records of Australian Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Historical Records of Australian Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Historical Records of Australian Science.

Countries where authors publish in Historical Records of Australian Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Historical Records of Australian Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Historical Records of Australian Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Historical Records of Australian Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025