Holzforschung

4.8k papers and 89.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.8k papers published in Holzforschung in the last decades have received a total of 89.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Holzforschung usually cover Biomedical Engineering (2.0k papers), Building and Construction (1.6k papers) and Plant Science (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Lignin and Wood Chemistry (1.9k papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (1.5k papers) and Advanced Cellulose Research Studies (581 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Holzforschung are O. Faix, Josef Gierer, Peter Niemz, Dietrich Fengel, T. Kent Kirk, A. Pizzi, Hou‐min Chang, Göran Gellerstedt, Callum A. S. Hill and Roger H. Newman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Holzforschung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Holzforschung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Holzforschung.

Countries where authors publish in Holzforschung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Holzforschung. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Holzforschung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holzforschung more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025