Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences.
About Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
The 1.2k papers published in Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 160.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences usually cover Geophysics (387 papers), Paleontology (210 papers) and Atmospheric Science (291 papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (268 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (241 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (207 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences are T. Mark Harrison, An Yin, W. R. Peltier, S. R. Hart, Alan Zindler, J.R. Gat, Robert J. Stern, Chris Marone, Julian A. Pearce and Paul F. Hoffman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.