Countries where authors publish in Climate of the past
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Climate of the past. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Climate of the past with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Climate of the past more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Climate of the past. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Climate of the past.
About Climate of the past
The 2.0k papers published in Climate of the past in the last decades have received a total of 59.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Climate of the past usually cover Atmospheric Science (1.9k papers), Paleontology (339 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (281 papers), Global and Planetary Change (643 papers) and Environmental Chemistry (291 papers) specifically the topics of Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (1.6k papers), Climate variability and models (448 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (407 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (390 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (288 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (283 papers), Geological formations and processes (211 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (183 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Climate of the past are Andrey Ganopolski, L. E. Lisiecki, Rachel Spratt, Ayako Abe‐Ouchi, Allegra N. LeGrande, Matthew Huber, J. D. Annan, J. C. Hargreaves, Masa Kageyama and Gerrit Lohmann.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.