Comptes Rendus Géoscience

1.8k papers and 39.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Comptes Rendus Géoscience in the last decades have received a total of 39.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Comptes Rendus Géoscience usually cover Geophysics (943 papers), Atmospheric Science (481 papers) and Earth-Surface Processes (305 papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (523 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (411 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (395 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comptes Rendus Géoscience are Catherine Mével, Vincent Courtillot, Paul R. Renne, Masatoshi Sone, Ian Metcalfe, Laurent Geoffroy, W. Neil Adger, Katharine Vincent, Michel Faure and Anke Jentsch.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Comptes Rendus Géoscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Comptes Rendus Géoscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comptes Rendus Géoscience.

Countries where authors publish in Comptes Rendus Géoscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comptes Rendus Géoscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comptes Rendus Géoscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comptes Rendus Géoscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025