Dose-Response

1.1k papers and 19.0k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Dose-Response in the last decades have received a total of 19.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Dose-Response usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (366 papers), Molecular Biology (293 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (182 papers) specifically the topics of Effects of Radiation Exposure (284 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (140 papers) and Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (129 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Dose-Response are Michael R. Hamblin, Bobby R. Scott, James D. Carroll, Ying‐Ying Huang, Laura N. Vandenberg, Jerry M. Cuttler, G. Christopher Cutler, Edward J. Calabrese, Aaron Chen and Kathrin Schmeißer.

In The Last Decade

Dose-Response

1.1k papers receiving 17.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Dose-Response

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Dose-Response. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Dose-Response.

Countries where authors publish in Dose-Response

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Dose-Response. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Dose-Response with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dose-Response more than expected).

Biphasic Dose Response in Low Level Light Therapy 2009 2026 2014 2020 756
  1. Biphasic Dose Response in Low Level Light Therapy (2009)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026