Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy

335 papers and 3.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 335 papers published in Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy in the last decades have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy usually cover Surgery (210 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (200 papers) and Oncology (65 papers) specifically the topics of Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (55 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (46 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy are Norman Oneil Machado, C. Wood, Chizu Yokoi, Yu-Tang Chang, Tomoyuki Yada, Naomi Uemura, Norihiko Ikeda, Richard D. Schulick, Ralph H. Hruban and Niraj Jani.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy.

Countries where authors publish in Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025