Basic and Clinical Andrology

317 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 317 papers published in Basic and Clinical Andrology in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Basic and Clinical Andrology usually cover Reproductive Medicine (150 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (83 papers) and Surgery (74 papers) specifically the topics of Sperm and Testicular Function (124 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (53 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Basic and Clinical Andrology are Kelton Tremellen, Cristián O’Flaherty, Faruk Hadžiselimović, Joël R. Drevet, Peter N. Schlegel, Serge Nef, Hakan Öztürk, Budi Wiweko, Ranjith Ramasamy and Karma Pearce.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Basic and Clinical Andrology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Basic and Clinical Andrology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Basic and Clinical Andrology.

Countries where authors publish in Basic and Clinical Andrology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Basic and Clinical Andrology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Basic and Clinical Andrology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Basic and Clinical Andrology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025