Developments in ophthalmology

610 papers and 7.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 610 papers published in Developments in ophthalmology in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Developments in ophthalmology usually cover Ophthalmology (415 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (245 papers) and Molecular Biology (112 papers) specifically the topics of Retinal Diseases and Treatments (144 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (130 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (117 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Developments in ophthalmology are Anat Loewenstein, Gábor Holló, José Cunha‐Vaz, Philip J. Rosenfeld, Christophe Baudouin, Francesco Bandello, G. Coscas, Dinah Zur, Bertil Damato and Marc D. de Smet.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Developments in ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Developments in ophthalmology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Developments in ophthalmology.

Countries where authors publish in Developments in ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Developments in ophthalmology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Developments in ophthalmology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Developments in ophthalmology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025